In an earlier post, I had a graph showing the Historical Tax Rates by Income Group using data from Pitketty & Saez. Here is another graph (found on Greg Mankiw’s Blog) which shows historical tax rates by income group but this time the data is from the Congressional Budget Office.

Addendum 3/3/08
The large difference between the two graphs is due to the treatment of payroll taxes paid by employers and the corporate income tax. The Pitketty & Saez data assumes these taxes are actually paid by employees and stockholders but the CBO data in the above graph does not include them.
Popularity: 4% [?]
I have been working on a graph to show how different US income data series compare to one another. I have plotted 8 income series from 4 different sources, including average and median income. Also I used the CPI-U to adjust each series to 2005 dollars instead of 2002$, 2003$ and 2004$.
Click on the graph to take a closer look:

Data sources for the income series can be found at:
Some of the differences in these series is due to the unit of measurement:
- Family is defined as two or more related people living together
- Households include families, singles, non-related people living together.
- Tax units are singles, married filling jointly, head of household.
Also over time, family and household sizes have been getting smaller.
If you see a problem with the graph you can post a comment. I plan to refine this graph over the next few weeks.
Addendum:
10/7/2006 Reformatted some of the labels and fixed the y-axis label
[tags]average income, median income, US income, US income distribution[/tags]
Popularity: 3% [?]
If after looking at the graphs I created (based the income data from the Congressional Budget Office) you decide you want to learn more about how the CBO calculates their numbers. You can take a look at an analysis of their report.
The following outlines the components of income included in the CBO’s analysis:
* Cash income, taxable and tax exempt, including wages, salaries, self-employment income, rents, taxable and nontaxable interest, dividends, realized capital gains, cash transfer payments, and retirement benefits
* Business taxes, including corporate income taxes, the employer’s share of Social Security, Medicare, and federal unemployment insurance payroll taxes (imputed to households, as per the assumptions on tax incidence above)
* Employees contributions to 401(k) retirement plans
* All in-kind benefits (Medicare, Medicaid, employer-paid health insurance premiums, food stamps, school lunches and breakfasts, housing assistance, and energy assistance)
Note that CBO:
* uses the Census Bureau’s fungible value measure for government in-kind transfers;
* does not adjust capital gains for inflation, and does not include unrealized capital gains or imputed rents on owner-occupied housing (see [1], pp. 23–24); and,
* double counts retirement income (see [1], p. 21).
Popularity: 2% [?]

Another post on the CBO report.
I combined the percentile income data for the past 20 years into three groups: bottom 60%, 60-95%, and top 5%.In 2002, if you lived in a household with a total income of:
less than $39,800 per year then you were in the bottom 60%
between $39,800 and $105,300 then you were in the 60-95% range
greater than $105,300 then you were in the top 5%
The first thing I noticed was that in 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 the total combined income of the top 5% was greater than the combined income of the bottom 60%.
The second thing I saw was the same income drop in 2000 from my earlier graphs (see: Changes in U.S. Total Income and Changes in Household Income by Quintiles). However, you can see that this dramatic decline is concentrated in the top 5%.
But looking at the graph below, it is in fact the top 1% that had the big decline, all of the previous graphs rolled up this change into the top 20% and top 5%. It even effected the total income. So in fact it wasn’t the top 20% that was hit hard by the stock market crash but the top 1%.

Popularity: 3% [?]

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has a report that looks at incomes across all households. Above, I have ploted the total income for the United States.
Below, I have ploted the average income for the United States. In both cases income drops after 2000.

Popularity: 4% [?]