The total return of the S&P 500 index fell by nearly 40% last year, the second-worst performance by America’s stockmarket since 1825…
Previous post: Unemployment: Housing Bubble vs Manufacturing (Jan 2009)
Next post: Designing for government services
Visualizing Economics was created by Catherine Mulbrandon. Here you can view graphs and charts about the United States and world economies. I am available for freelance projects.
Infographics listed in VE Inforgraphics by Catherine Mulbrandon are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Images created by others retain the © of their respective owners, and their reproduction here for educational and critical purposes constitutes fair use.
View my LinkedIn Profile
Email me at
catherine[at]mrdiconsulting.com
Subscribe via RSS
Become a fan on Facebook
Follow me on Twitter
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Terrible chart. Why plot the negative returns below the x-axis? Look at the chart in this post, which provides the same information about the S&P 500. To me, the salient point is not that 2008 was such a bad year. It’s the fact that the annual returns appear totally normal (i.e., Gaussian) — or at least “mound shaped” as they say in statistics classes.
This contradicts what gurus like Nasim Taleb have been saying. Looking at the data, 2008 was not a “Black Swan” at all, but rather was totally consistent with past performance of the market. The error, perhaps, was the belief that annual returns were no longer what they had been — that we had entered a new era.