<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Health Care Spending 1965-2008 [Nytimes]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/</link>
	<description>Making the "Invisible Hand" Visible</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:29:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-36303</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/#comment-36303</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s already been ajusted for inflation.....i-dot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s already been ajusted for inflation&#8230;..i-dot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alena</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-34839</link>
		<dc:creator>Alena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/#comment-34839</guid>
		<description>I see only bad text</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see only bad text</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PublicHealthBugle.com &#187; Topics Covering the Uninsured and Health Care Spending</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-34161</link>
		<dc:creator>PublicHealthBugle.com &#187; Topics Covering the Uninsured and Health Care Spending</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 03:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/#comment-34161</guid>
		<description>[...] 2) Health Care Spending from 1965-2008 (source: Visualizing Economics) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2) Health Care Spending from 1965-2008 (source: Visualizing Economics) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Wisdom Roundup #19 (Massive List) Part 1 &#124; Simoleon Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-34075</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Wisdom Roundup #19 (Massive List) Part 1 &#124; Simoleon Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/#comment-34075</guid>
		<description>[...] Graphic: Awesome Must Watch This On: Health Care Spending 1965-2008- Via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Graphic: Awesome Must Watch This On: Health Care Spending 1965-2008- Via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Son Coahuila</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-33994</link>
		<dc:creator>Son Coahuila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 15:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/#comment-33994</guid>
		<description>I bet if you remove &quot;private insurers&quot; and then correct for inflation it&#039;s almost a straight line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet if you remove &#8220;private insurers&#8221; and then correct for inflation it&#8217;s almost a straight line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lash</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-33895</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2009/03/11/health-care-spending-1965-2008-nytimes/#comment-33895</guid>
		<description>Truly scary graph. Thanks for sharing it.

To me, this is exhibit A for why we have to pursue health care reform sooner rather than later. To solve the problem and create a sustainable health care system for the future, we need to unpack the sources of the increases. I heard a statistic once (hope it&#039;s right!) that in the 1950s, we spent $500 on health care per person per year. Now we spend $5,000. Adjusted for inflation? I don&#039;t know. But think about it: all the new procedures, treatments, prescriptions.

Rationing is a dirty word in health care, but look at that graph and tell me how we crack this nut without applying an 80/20 mentality to what we fund and what we don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly scary graph. Thanks for sharing it.</p>
<p>To me, this is exhibit A for why we have to pursue health care reform sooner rather than later. To solve the problem and create a sustainable health care system for the future, we need to unpack the sources of the increases. I heard a statistic once (hope it&#8217;s right!) that in the 1950s, we spent $500 on health care per person per year. Now we spend $5,000. Adjusted for inflation? I don&#8217;t know. But think about it: all the new procedures, treatments, prescriptions.</p>
<p>Rationing is a dirty word in health care, but look at that graph and tell me how we crack this nut without applying an 80/20 mentality to what we fund and what we don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
