<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adoption of New Technology since 1900</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/</link>
	<description>Making the "Invisible Hand" Visible</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:18:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thom Haliburton</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-39525</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom Haliburton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 01:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-39525</guid>
		<description>@John Doe:  I checked the census (census.gov): In 1947 the US had around 39.000 households, so 3% were about 1,200 households who used radios, but didnâ€™t have electricity yet. Quite realistic, donâ€™t you think?

No, not at all.  There were about 131 million people living in the United States in 1940.

http://www2.census.gov/prod2/decennial/documents/23761117v1ch03.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John Doe:  I checked the census (census.gov): In 1947 the US had around 39.000 households, so 3% were about 1,200 households who used radios, but didnâ€™t have electricity yet. Quite realistic, donâ€™t you think?</p>
<p>No, not at all.  There were about 131 million people living in the United States in 1940.</p>
<p><a href="http://www2.census.gov/prod2/decennial/documents/23761117v1ch03.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www2.census.gov/prod2/decennial/documents/23761117v1ch03.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skip</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-33909</link>
		<dc:creator>Skip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-33909</guid>
		<description>Martin, you ever hear of the crystal radio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin, you ever hear of the crystal radio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paradox of success: Speed. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-29340</link>
		<dc:creator>Paradox of success: Speed. -- Hoover&#8217;s Business Insight Zone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-29340</guid>
		<description>[...] all heard it many times: the pace of life is speeding up. Technologies are adopted faster than ever before. Businesses have to keep accelerating their efforts if they want to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all heard it many times: the pace of life is speeding up. Technologies are adopted faster than ever before. Businesses have to keep accelerating their efforts if they want to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-23342</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-23342</guid>
		<description>Patty, I am happy to have my worked used in the classroom. Just be aware that not all the graphs on my site were created by me. Also you can subscribe to my site by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=233227&amp;loc=en_US&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Email&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patty, I am happy to have my worked used in the classroom. Just be aware that not all the graphs on my site were created by me. Also you can subscribe to my site by <a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=233227&#038;loc=en_US" rel="nofollow">Email</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patty Burnside</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-23134</link>
		<dc:creator>Patty Burnside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-23134</guid>
		<description>Catherine,

Your site is quite helpful for teaching economics to high school students.  Is there a way to get on your mailing list to receive all of your visualizing economics postings?  Do you grant permission for your material to be copied for classroom use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Catherine,</p>
<p>Your site is quite helpful for teaching economics to high school students.  Is there a way to get on your mailing list to receive all of your visualizing economics postings?  Do you grant permission for your material to be copied for classroom use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-18493</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 17:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-18493</guid>
		<description>hey, I think that you could have a little more information instead of ceaping your readers wondreing and not answering there questions it looks like you put this site together in a few houres you should put a little more work into your site you readers are going to stop reading if you dont spend a little bit more time and effort into your work i will reply when you update

please its for you best intrest to improve your site if you want more viewers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey, I think that you could have a little more information instead of ceaping your readers wondreing and not answering there questions it looks like you put this site together in a few houres you should put a little more work into your site you readers are going to stop reading if you dont spend a little bit more time and effort into your work i will reply when you update</p>
<p>please its for you best intrest to improve your site if you want more viewers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yes, FriendFeed Will Be Mainstream (by 2018) and Here&#8217;s Why &#171; I&#8217;m Not Actually a Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-18463</link>
		<dc:creator>Yes, FriendFeed Will Be Mainstream (by 2018) and Here&#8217;s Why &#171; I&#8217;m Not Actually a Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 07:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-18463</guid>
		<description>[...] chart below, courtesy of Visualizing Economics, shows how long several popular technologies took to be adopted in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chart below, courtesy of Visualizing Economics, shows how long several popular technologies took to be adopted in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-18397</link>
		<dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-18397</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, I don&#039;t know but the article the graph came from was a op-ed written by W. Michael Cox chief economist and Richard Alm senior economics writer at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t know but the article the graph came from was a op-ed written by W. Michael Cox chief economist and Richard Alm senior economics writer at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atul</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-18393</link>
		<dc:creator>Atul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-18393</guid>
		<description>This is super. 

What is the source of Nicholas Felton&#039;s technology adoption data?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is super. </p>
<p>What is the source of Nicholas Felton&#8217;s technology adoption data?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skep</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/comment-page-1/#comment-16739</link>
		<dc:creator>Skep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2008/02/18/adoption-of-new-technology-since-1900/#comment-16739</guid>
		<description>I would guess that the biggest contributor has been lower costs. The global industrial complex, over the last 100 years has become more interconnected and sophisticated. Lowering costs significantly reduces early-adopter risks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess that the biggest contributor has been lower costs. The global industrial complex, over the last 100 years has become more interconnected and sophisticated. Lowering costs significantly reduces early-adopter risks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
