<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Income Series</title>
	<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/09/02/comparing-income-series/</link>
	<description>Making the "Invisible Hand" Visible</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Schaeffer</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/09/02/comparing-income-series/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Schaeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/09/02/comparing-income-series/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Was this from an Excel spreadsheet? How did you generate the chart? Excel? Could you please send me a copy of the spreadsheet. Thank you. You have my Email address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was this from an Excel spreadsheet? How did you generate the chart? Excel? Could you please send me a copy of the spreadsheet. Thank you. You have my Email address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Schaeffer</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/09/02/comparing-income-series/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Schaeffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/09/02/comparing-income-series/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>The table is a good one. However, you should have added a line for "Families - Wife Not in Paid Labor Force". This number rose from $22,028 in 1950 to $42,049 in 1973 and is unchanged ($42,221 in 2004) since. In other words, essentially all gains in family income since 1973 have come from increasing effort (wives working) rather than rising wages/salaries. Given that BLS GDP per worker has soared since 1973, this is quite revealing.

Thank you

Peter Schaeffer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The table is a good one. However, you should have added a line for &#8220;Families - Wife Not in Paid Labor Force&#8221;. This number rose from $22,028 in 1950 to $42,049 in 1973 and is unchanged ($42,221 in 2004) since. In other words, essentially all gains in family income since 1973 have come from increasing effort (wives working) rather than rising wages/salaries. Given that BLS GDP per worker has soared since 1973, this is quite revealing.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
<p>Peter Schaeffer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joan</title>
		<link>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/09/02/comparing-income-series/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>joan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 10:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.visualizingeconomics.com/2006/09/02/comparing-income-series/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>The Blog &lt;a href="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2006/09/krugman_on_trac.html"&gt;economistview&lt;/a&gt; has list of the best sources for income data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Blog <a href="http://economistsview.typepad.com/economistsview/2006/09/krugman_on_trac.html">economistview</a> has list of the best sources for income data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
