
Another post on the CBO report.
I combined the percentile income data for the past 20 years into three groups: bottom 60%, 60-95%, and top 5%.In 2002, if you lived in a household with a total income of:
- less than $39,800 per year then you were in the bottom 60%
- between $39,800 and $105,300 then you were in the 60-95% range
- greater than $105,300 then you were in the top 5%
The first thing I noticed was that in 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 the total combined income of the top 5% was greater than the combined income of the bottom 60%.
The second thing I saw was the same income drop in 2000 from my earlier graphs (see: Changes in U.S. Total Income and Changes in Household Income by Quintiles). However, you can see that this dramatic decline is concentrated in the top 5%.
But looking at the graph below, it is in fact the top 1% that had the big decline, all of the previous graphs rolled up this change into the top 20% and top 5%. It even effected the total income. So in fact it wasn’t the top 20% that was hit hard by the stock market crash but the top 1%.

Popularity: 3% [?]
Get the latest graphs and maps sent to you automatically!
Subscribe to my RSS feed or sign up for updates by email.
Subscribe
Email Updates
Follow me on Twitter
Мухахахаха, да вы у Ð½Ð°Ñ Ñ„Ð¸Ð»Ð¾Ñоф аффтар?